29 Jun 2011
Stakeholders Meeting

Yesterday was a good day for residents of the Sonoran Preserve area: the Sonoran Boulevard community discussion went well and I’m hopeful that all the parties walked away feeling that the issues are resolved. The official summation of the meeting from Mr. David Tierney will be presented to the Phoenix City Council at the July 6 meeting. Here are some quick thoughts from the 3+ hour session:
This was a stakeholders meeting, so various groups were represented. This included representatives from the Sonoran Citizens Improvement Association and other homeowners groups, the city streets department, and other city/state agencies, village planning committee, and commercial/residential developers. Groups sat facing each other in a semicircle. The discussion was moderated by Mr. Tierney, a construction lawyer.
The primary outcome is that current construction on the long-planned Sonoran Boulevard project will as continue as planned, with the northern alignment completed first. Additional recommendations were also discussed. A set of final recommendations will be voted on by the Phoenix City Council since each has a cost. Here are the most relevant recommendations:
- Changing what is currently called Sonoran Boulevard (east of the fork in the road, please refer to the Streets map) back to “Dove Valley Road,” and Sonoran Desert Drive to “Sonoran Boulevard.” Sonoran Boulevard west of the fork until Cave Creek road will retain its name. (I’ll continue to use the current names on my blog until this change is approved.)
- Studying and defining the right-of-way for Sonoran Desert Drive - the “southern road” – from 18th Ave east to the fork in the road in preparation for future development. The land for this road is currently owned by the state of Arizona, but siting can be done before the city acquires the land.
- Possible reduced speed limits in the residential portion of Sonoran Boulevard based on traffic patterns. Possibly an electronic radar sign that warns drivers if they’re speeding.
- Possibly rubberizing residential asphalt to reduce road noise. It was stated that the noise reduction would be negligible compared to new asphalt, and would be very expensive. This is unlikely to be approved.
These are good solutions, I believe most people in the room agreed on them. The only concerns I still have:
Our community needs some sort of connection to the freeway. Neither last night’s panel nor the city can force developers to build them. This blog has always been about smart growth, including accounting for increased traffic. Due to budget constraints, the city is largely relying on developers to build two connectors (across Skunk Creek) to I-17 from North Valley Parkway. It is vital that we encourage commercial growth in our area to get these exit points in place, otherwise the intersection at 27th Dr/Carefree Highway will choke.
Ultimately we need development in our area to provide services to residents. A representative from the Arizona Association of General Contractors was concerned that any further delays would have a chilling effect on local development, which is the last thing the community needs. In addition to freeway access, we still lack simple things like a grocery store or a gas station, yet there are hundreds of acres of undeveloped commercial property alongside the I-17. We now need to send a united message to developers that the North Gateway Village core is open for business – and the Sonoran Boulevard matter is closed.
Thanks to Councilman Bryan Jeffries for getting this meeting put together, and to David Tierney for donating his time promoting and facilitating this discussion.
